[pdDMG] A definition for F_meas_squared for powder data
Robert Von Dreele
vondreele at anl.gov
Wed Mar 22 13:11:43 GMT 2017
Good
On 3/21/2017 5:43 PM, James Hester wrote:
> A further refinement to the definition based on feedback:
>
> ;
> The structure factor amplitude for the reflection derived by
> partitioning
> the background-subtracted observed intensity
> _pd_proc.intensity_net between
> reflections in the same proportion as those reflections contribute to
> the corresponding background-free calculated point in
> _pd_calc.intensity_net .
>
> ;
>
>
> On 21 March 2017 at 16:37, James Hester <jamesrhester at gmail.com
> <mailto:jamesrhester at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Examination of the GSAS-II GetFobsSq routine suggests that a more
> precise definition would note that the background should be
> subtracted first. I propose the following revised definition:
>
> ;
> The structure factor amplitude for the reflection derived
> from a powder
> histogram by partitioning observed intensity between peaks at
> each point
> in the same proportion as the model peaks contribute to that
> point.
> Model background is subtracted from both observed and
> calculated values
> before partitioning.
> ;
>
> On 13 March 2017 at 15:43, James Hester <jamesrhester at gmail.com
> <mailto:jamesrhester at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear Powder Dictionary Management Group,
>
> It is now recognised formally that CIF dictionaries may need
> to redefine datanames, and DDLm has been equipped with some
> facilities to handle this. In the case of the DDLm version of
> the powder dictionary, as far as I can tell the only two
> datanames from the core that are implicitly different are
> refln.F_complex and refln.F_meas_squared. _refln.F_complex is
> different purely because the phase id has to be considered
> when performing the calculation (unlike in the core case).
> _refln.F_meas_squared is different both because of the need to
> consider phase_id, but also because the procedure for
> calculating f_meas_squared from the powder histogram is
> completely different to the single crystal case. Could you
> all please consider what I have written below for
> F_meas_squared, and suggest any improvements. Ideally, the
> definition text should be clear enough for a programmer to
> implement the calculation.
>
> While I would appreciate feedback from at least some of you,
> if I don't hear from you within a week or so, I will assume
> that the definition below is adequate.
>
> all the best,
> James.
>
>
> (New cif_pow definitions follow)
>
> save_refln.F_complex
>
> _definition.id <http://definition.id> '_refln.F_complex'
> loop_
> _alias.definition_id
> '_refln.F_complex'
> '_refln_F_complex'
> _definition.update 2017-03-07
> _description.text
> ;
> The structure factor vector for the reflection calculated
> from
> the atom site data for the phase given by phase_id.
> ;
> _name.category_id refln
> _name.object_id F_complex
> _type.purpose Measurand
> _type.source Derived
> _type.container Single
> _type.contents Complex
> _enumeration.default 0.
> loop_
> _method.purpose
> _method.expression
> Definition
> ;
> If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "neutron")
> _units.code = "femtometres"
> Else If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "electron")
> _units.code = "volts"
> Else _units.code = "electrons"
> ;
>
> save_
>
> save_refln.F_squared_meas
>
> _definition.id <http://definition.id> '_refln.F_squared_meas'
> loop_
> _alias.definition_id
> '_refln.F_meas'
> '_refln_F_meas'
> _definition.update 2017-03-07
> _description.text
> ;
> The structure factor amplitude for the reflection derived
> from a powder
> histogram by partitioning observed intensity between
> peaks at each point
> in the same proportion as the model peaks contribute to
> that point.
> ;
> _name.category_id refln
> _name.object_id F_squared_meas
> _type.purpose Measurand
> _type.source Derived
> _type.container Single
> _type.contents Real
> _enumeration.default 0.
> loop_
> _method.purpose
> _method.expression
> Definition
> ;
> If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "neutron")
> _units.code = "femtometres"
> Else If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "electron")
> _units.code = "volts"
> Else _units.code = "electrons"
> ;
>
> save_
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907 <tel:+61%202%209717%209907>
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145 <tel:+61%202%209717%203145>
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>
>
>
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907 <tel:+61%202%209717%209907>
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145 <tel:+61%202%209717%203145>
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>
>
>
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pdDMG mailing list
> pdDMG at iucr.org
> http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pddmg
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iucr.org/pipermail/pddmg/attachments/20170322/e4fbbb37/attachment.html>
More information about the pdDMG
mailing list