[pdDMG] A definition for F_meas_squared for powder data
James Hester
jamesrhester at gmail.com
Tue Mar 21 22:43:50 GMT 2017
A further refinement to the definition based on feedback:
;
The structure factor amplitude for the reflection derived by
partitioning
the background-subtracted observed intensity _pd_proc.intensity_net
between
reflections in the same proportion as those reflections contribute to
the corresponding background-free calculated point in
_pd_calc.intensity_net .
;
On 21 March 2017 at 16:37, James Hester <jamesrhester at gmail.com> wrote:
> Examination of the GSAS-II GetFobsSq routine suggests that a more precise
> definition would note that the background should be subtracted first. I
> propose the following revised definition:
>
> ;
> The structure factor amplitude for the reflection derived from a
> powder
> histogram by partitioning observed intensity between peaks at each
> point
> in the same proportion as the model peaks contribute to that point.
> Model background is subtracted from both observed and calculated
> values
> before partitioning.
> ;
>
> On 13 March 2017 at 15:43, James Hester <jamesrhester at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Powder Dictionary Management Group,
>>
>> It is now recognised formally that CIF dictionaries may need to redefine
>> datanames, and DDLm has been equipped with some facilities to handle this.
>> In the case of the DDLm version of the powder dictionary, as far as I can
>> tell the only two datanames from the core that are implicitly different are
>> refln.F_complex and refln.F_meas_squared. _refln.F_complex is different
>> purely because the phase id has to be considered when performing the
>> calculation (unlike in the core case). _refln.F_meas_squared is different
>> both because of the need to consider phase_id, but also because the
>> procedure for calculating f_meas_squared from the powder histogram is
>> completely different to the single crystal case. Could you all please
>> consider what I have written below for F_meas_squared, and suggest any
>> improvements. Ideally, the definition text should be clear enough for a
>> programmer to implement the calculation.
>>
>> While I would appreciate feedback from at least some of you, if I don't
>> hear from you within a week or so, I will assume that the definition below
>> is adequate.
>>
>> all the best,
>> James.
>>
>>
>> (New cif_pow definitions follow)
>>
>> save_refln.F_complex
>>
>> _definition.id '_refln.F_complex'
>> loop_
>> _alias.definition_id
>> '_refln.F_complex'
>> '_refln_F_complex'
>> _definition.update 2017-03-07
>> _description.text
>> ;
>> The structure factor vector for the reflection calculated from
>> the atom site data for the phase given by phase_id.
>> ;
>> _name.category_id refln
>> _name.object_id F_complex
>> _type.purpose Measurand
>> _type.source Derived
>> _type.container Single
>> _type.contents Complex
>> _enumeration.default 0.
>> loop_
>> _method.purpose
>> _method.expression
>> Definition
>> ;
>> If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "neutron") _units.code =
>> "femtometres"
>> Else If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "electron") _units.code = "volts"
>> Else _units.code =
>> "electrons"
>> ;
>>
>> save_
>>
>> save_refln.F_squared_meas
>>
>> _definition.id '_refln.F_squared_meas'
>> loop_
>> _alias.definition_id
>> '_refln.F_meas'
>> '_refln_F_meas'
>> _definition.update 2017-03-07
>> _description.text
>> ;
>> The structure factor amplitude for the reflection derived from a
>> powder
>> histogram by partitioning observed intensity between peaks at each
>> point
>> in the same proportion as the model peaks contribute to that point.
>> ;
>> _name.category_id refln
>> _name.object_id F_squared_meas
>> _type.purpose Measurand
>> _type.source Derived
>> _type.container Single
>> _type.contents Real
>> _enumeration.default 0.
>> loop_
>> _method.purpose
>> _method.expression
>> Definition
>> ;
>> If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "neutron") _units.code =
>> "femtometres"
>> Else If (_diffrn_radiation.probe == "electron") _units.code = "volts"
>> Else _units.code =
>> "electrons"
>> ;
>>
>> save_
>>
>> --
>> T +61 (02) 9717 9907 <+61%202%209717%209907>
>> F +61 (02) 9717 3145 <+61%202%209717%203145>
>> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>>
>
>
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907 <+61%202%209717%209907>
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145 <+61%202%209717%203145>
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iucr.org/pipermail/pddmg/attachments/20170322/1e8f1e67/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the pdDMG
mailing list