CCDC/IUCr Journals proposal 4: capturing information about experimental facilities

[James Hester]

A more useful link to the actual 'issue' is
https://github.com/COMCIFS/cif_core/issues/176.

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 17:23, James Hester <jamesrhester at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Core CIF DMG,
>
> As nobody has any further comments, I think we can state that the Core DMG
> agrees with this proposal.  As a technical issue, these datanames should
> have dotted form, and should be defined in DDLm, as that is our standard
> dictionary language. The practical use will not change, of course (there is
> no impediment to using dotted datanames in a CIF1 format file, for
> example).  I will create an issue in the core CIF Github repository (
> https://github.com/COMCIFS/cif_core/issues) to track this update.
>
> James.
>
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 17:39, James Hester <jamesrhester at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> For full details see
>> https://www.iucr.org/__data/iucr/lists/coredmg/msg00345.html
>>
>> In summary, data names are proposed that capture facility and
>> beamline/instrument names.
>>
>> My comments: I think these are both excellent suggestions.  I think we
>> could also make a dataname for
>>
>> (1) the ORCID id of the instrument, if it exists
>> (2) a citation for the instrument. This could link to a citation in the
>> list of citations.
>>
>> Anybody else have any comments?
>>
>> James.
>> --
>> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
>> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
>> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>>
>
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>


-- 
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iucr.org/pipermail/coredmg/attachments/20200427/b14b44aa/attachment.html>