CCDC/IUCr Journals proposal 4: capturing information about experimental facilities

[James Hester]

Dear Core CIF DMG,

As nobody has any further comments, I think we can state that the Core DMG
agrees with this proposal.  As a technical issue, these datanames should
have dotted form, and should be defined in DDLm, as that is our standard
dictionary language. The practical use will not change, of course (there is
no impediment to using dotted datanames in a CIF1 format file, for
example).  I will create an issue in the core CIF Github repository (
https://github.com/COMCIFS/cif_core/issues) to track this update.

James.

On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 17:39, James Hester <jamesrhester at gmail.com> wrote:

> For full details see
> https://www.iucr.org/__data/iucr/lists/coredmg/msg00345.html
>
> In summary, data names are proposed that capture facility and
> beamline/instrument names.
>
> My comments: I think these are both excellent suggestions.  I think we
> could also make a dataname for
>
> (1) the ORCID id of the instrument, if it exists
> (2) a citation for the instrument. This could link to a citation in the
> list of citations.
>
> Anybody else have any comments?
>
> James.
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>


-- 
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iucr.org/pipermail/coredmg/attachments/20200427/4124691d/attachment.html>