Final draft of Phase-ID report
S. C. Abrahams sca at mind.netMon Jul 12 15:12:34 BST 2004
- Previous message: Final draft of Phase-ID report
- Next message: The IUPAC-NIST Chemical Identifier
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dear David: Thanks, I will look forward to seeing the final draft in due course.. >6. The section GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS ...... >If you have some suggestions I will be glad to consider them. I would suggest the following for consideration: "The possibility of using an early but incorrect characterization is usually avoidable by refering to the appropriate crystallographic database. In the event that such ill-characterization has not yet been corrected, the identifier might retrieve more than one structure, as is the case in which the characterization is incomplete." Although this statement is offered rather tentatively, I think a warning to the user that ill-characterization is possible but may sometimes be corrected would be helpful. By all means, feel entirely free to improvwe the statement. >I have no idea what it [main] means either, but I copied this from the only >material that was available. Maybe version 1.0 will be more explicit. We should avoid any usage we cannot explain. Sidney ------------------------------------------ Prof. S. C. Abrahams Physics Department Southern Oregon University Ashland, OR 97520 Fax: (541) 552-6415 Tel. (541) 482-7942 Email: sca at mind.net ------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Final draft of Phase-ID report
- Next message: The IUPAC-NIST Chemical Identifier
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the phase-identifiers mailing list