Final draft of Phase-ID report
David Brown idbrown at mcmaster.caFri Jul 9 12:45:41 BST 2004
- Previous message: Final draft of Phase-ID report
- Next message: Final draft of Phase-ID report
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sam, Thank you for giving your approval to the Phase Identifier report. Clearly in your case the chemcial component of the INChI identifier is likely to be as important as the crystallographic component. I believe there are programs available for creating the INChI structure layer from a knowledge of the connectivity. It will be important to get some experience in using the crystallography-enhanced INChI to find out where it needs some fine tuning. The best solution to the chiral space group problem is to treat chiral pairs as equivalent. Any information about the true chirality should be given in the part of INChI that describes the molecular chirality. I will make the necessary changes to this section before submitting the report. By the way, the real reason for changing IChI to INChI was that people began to scratch themselves as soon as we started talking about IChI. Spurred by the (apparent) recommendations to look at Steve Heller's article, I clicked on the URL but was disappointed in what I found. The paper falls short of its claim in the abstract that it 'surveys ... how XML, CML and the INChI activities are having and will continue to have a major impact on scientific publishing'. I suppose it is the text of a feel-good talk, great for the occasion on which it was delivered but not suitable for publication as a retrievable document (why else would keywords be given?). It is a good example of the dangers of unreferred and unedited web publishing. I not only found the paper uninformative (too many generalities and no substance), but it was a good example of what the paper itself describes as the loser technology - a printed paper in electronic clothing (even the URLs were not active on my browser). Even though it had a good collection of references, I found it a poor advertisement for the virtues of electronic publishing. David -- Dr. I.D.Brown, Professor Emeritus, Department of Physics and Astronomy McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario, Canada
- Previous message: Final draft of Phase-ID report
- Next message: Final draft of Phase-ID report
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the phase-identifiers mailing list