Ambiguity in atom_site.disorder_group value -1

[Robert Hanson]

Understood. I will still claim it as a feature request, perhaps not fully
thought out on my part (as for example, adding the translations to the
symmetry operations, as for bonding. It arose because as far as I know
there is no way to describe this for symmetry-equivalent disorder groups
the way John points out is readily available for "standard"
non-symmetry-related disorder. Just seems to me to be an omission.

I won't belabor this. If there is an official way to suggest a
feature/consideration for the next update of CIF, please let me know.

Thanks for the discussion. Thanks for suggesting this list, Brian.

Bob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.iucr.org/pipermail/coredmg/attachments/20221031/9de5667f/attachment.htm>