Tentative agenda for COMCIFS closed meetings Aug 28th and Aug 29th

James Hester jamesrhester at gmail.com
Tue Aug 16 09:02:55 BST 2011

Dear COMCIFS members,

While in an ideal world we would all have had time to digest and consider
the new DDLm proposal well prior to the meeting, I am informed that it is
relatively recent work with the final touches still being applied. Syd and
Nick quite reasonably would like a chance to guide us through it before we
begin discussion. So, given the short time between presentation and
discussion, I do not think a vote to adopt the new DDLm is likely to occur
at the second closed meeting.  Likewise, without consideration of the
contents of the new DDLm proposal, it would not be sensible to adopt the
"old" DDLm specification.  I am however hopeful that CIF2 syntax will be
relatively unaffected by the new DDLm proposal, so that we have a reasonable
chance of voting to accept syntax.  For this reason I have suggested that
only a CIF2 syntax vote will be conducted.

Of course, if we all find ourselves in agreement, then we may also vote on
adopting DDLm.

I hope that this clarifies the situation.


On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Herbert J. Bernstein <
yaya at bernstein-plus-sons.com> wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
>  Might is be possible to see a document on the new DDLm prior to the
> meeting?
>  Shouldn't we be having three separate discussions and possible votes: One
> on DDLm as currently posted, one on DDLm as newly presented, and one on
> CIF2?  The first of these could be done on the 28th.
>   Regards,
>     Herbert
> ==============================**=======================
>  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
>   Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
>        Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
>                 +1-631-244-3035
>                 yaya at dowling.edu
> ==============================**=======================
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, James Hester wrote:
>  Dear COMCIFS members:
>> Below is a tentative agenda for the two COMCIFS closed meetings.  Note
>> that the Aug 29th meeting will
>> occur directly after MS89, at which Nick Spadaccini and Syd Hall will be
>> presenting a revised version of
>> DDLm.  I expect that presentation to provoke considerable discussion,
>> which is why the Aug 29th meeting
>> will be entirely devoted to CIF2 and DDLm discussion.  Please advise if
>> you would like anything added to
>> the agenda on Aug 28th.
>> COMCIFS meeting agenda: Aug 28th
>> 1. Brief report from chair on developments in previous triennium
>> 2. COMCIFS directions over next triennium:
>>  (i) reforming dictionary management (see also Brian MacMahon's email of
>> July 6th)
>>  (ii) developing a solid software base (APIs, canonical parser libraries
>> in C/C++)
>>  (iii) other concerns to be raised by members
>> COMCIFS meeting agenda: Aug 29th
>> 3. Discussion of DDLm as presented in MS89
>> 4. Subject to outcome, if any, of (3), *final* vote on CIF2 syntax draft
>> as distributed by email last week
>> 5. Any other business
>> ================
>> Explanation of item 2(i):
>> I propose partitioning dictionaries that are managed by COMCIFS into three
>> groups:
>> (i) the 'core' group which are small enough and/or general enough for
>> COMCIFS members to be able to
>> approve both content and technical conformance;
>> (ii) a 'delegated' group where COMCIFS delegates management of dictionary
>> content to an outside body or
>> dictionary management group; once COMCIFS has voted to delegate this
>> management, no further votes would be
>> required to approve dictionary content or updates, but technical
>> correctness would be checked;
>> (iii) a 'contributed' group where COMCIFS makes no statement as to
>> scientific content and simply checks
>> technical conformance.  This group would correspond to those dictionaries
>> that Brian was discussing in his
>> email, and technical conformance would mean a simple syntax and DDL
>> conformance check, not requiring a
>> vote at COMCIFS level.
>> Explanation of item 2(ii):
>> Over the years COMCIFS has had various initiatives to produce and promote
>> CIF software, but we are still
>> at the stage where it is difficult to find a standalone CIF parser written
>> in C that could serve as a
>> starting point for integration into other languages, scripting or
>> compiled, or could be dropped into a
>> larger software project.  Part of such an effort would be development of
>> an API.  I propose that COMCIFS
>> set itself the entirely modest goal of developing and approving an API and
>> a modular C parser before the
>> next meeting.  We will discuss the best way forward.
>> --
>> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
>> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
>> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
> _______________________________________________
> comcifs mailing list
> comcifs at iucr.org
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/comcifs

T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://scripts.iucr.org/pipermail/comcifs/attachments/20110816/f95ba376/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the comcifs mailing list