Time to drop STAR?
Joe Krahn krahn at niehs.nih.govTue Mar 13 14:06:11 GMT 2007
- Previous message: COMCIFS Annual Report for 2006 (draft)
- Next message: Data names with primitive type info?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The CIF specifications could be simplified by dropping all of the discussion about differences to STAR. With bracket delimiters and possible MIME-based text, CIF will no longer be a subset of STAR anyhow. Also, it would be nice to finalize other STAR left-overs like nested loops. I noticed that the mmCIF NMR extension already uses nested loops. Therefore, I think the best solution is to include nested loops in the CIF syntax, but leave them as optional features, similar to the way parsing of save-frames is not a mandatory feature. Likewise, GLOBAL_ should probably be dropped, or included as optional, possibly with different rules from STAR. I think it would also be good to allow nested save frames as an optional extension, depending on whether anybody else thinks it is a useful idea. Joe Krahn
- Previous message: COMCIFS Annual Report for 2006 (draft)
- Next message: Data names with primitive type info?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the comcifs mailing list