New accent modifier types?
Joe Krahn krahn at niehs.nih.govTue Mar 6 17:55:58 GMT 2007
- Previous message: dictionary data-name global?
- Next message: New accent modifier types?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
When I first looked into accents, I thought the Latin1 and Latin2 character groups should be sufficient, but Latin3 and Latin4 are needed to include some characters accents like over-bar. But, they also include a few other unusual (to me) modifiers like Horn and Hook. It would not be too hard to define modifiers for these. Would these be useful to anyone, or are these excessive for the needs of CIF markup? Should we ask somebody from Iceland? What do people think about including a blank space as a modifiable letter? The one caveat is "\% " as the degree sign instead of "\%". Also, there could be a rule that a disallowed letter shows the accent as a separate character, so "\%F" would be "<degree sign>F" and not F-ring, because there is no F-ring. What opinions are there on deprecating the bare letter codes -- the ones with no leading backslash? Right now, they are all in the "accepted by convention" list, so it seems to me that deprecating them is not so bad. Is anybody in favor of keeping the bare mnemonics? Also, the current set has single-bond graphically, and other bonds by name. What do people think of using graphics in all cases, with characters used in SMILES/SMARTs? This could have either one or two backslashes: \\-- single bond \\== double \\## triple \\$$ or \\4- quadruple (Some SMARTS use $) \\5- quintuple (almost useless, but not impossible) Joe Krahn
- Previous message: dictionary data-name global?
- Next message: New accent modifier types?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the comcifs mailing list